Elisabeth joined Beard Winter LLP’s Insurance Litigation group after working as in-house litigation counsel for one of Canada’s largest insurers. Prior to going in-house, Elisabeth had a broad plaintiff-oriented civil litigation practice at a well-regarded civil litigation boutique. Her understanding of insurance litigation from a plaintiff point of view is invaluable to her clients. While Elisabeth’s practice is mainly focused on insurance litigation, she also acts for clients in commercial, real estate, and environmental litigation matters. Elisabeth has previously acted for clients in the professional liability, civil sexual assault, medical malpractice, human rights, and employment law contexts. Her understanding of the litigation process from start to finish gives her clients confidence in her advice.
Elisabeth joined Beard Winter LLP’s Insurance Litigation group after working as in-house litigation counsel for one of Canada’s largest insurers. Prior to going in-house, Elisabeth had a broad plaintiff-oriented civil litigation practice at a well-regarded civil litigation boutique. Her understanding of insurance litigation from a plaintiff point of view is invaluable to her clients. While Elisabeth’s practice is mainly focused on insurance litigation, she also acts for clients in commercial, real estate, and environmental litigation matters. Elisabeth has previously acted for clients in the professional liability, civil sexual assault, medical malpractice, human rights, and employment law contexts. Her understanding of the litigation process from start to finish gives her clients confidence in her advice.
Elisabeth joined Beard Winter LLP’s Insurance Litigation group after working as in-house litigation counsel for one of Canada’s largest insurers. Prior to going in-house, Elisabeth had a broad plaintiff-oriented civil litigation practice at a well-regarded civil litigation boutique. Her understanding of insurance litigation from a plaintiff point of view is invaluable to her clients. While Elisabeth’s practice is mainly focused on insurance litigation, she also acts for clients in commercial, real estate, and environmental litigation matters. Elisabeth has previously acted for clients in the professional liability, civil sexual assault, medical malpractice, human rights, and employment law contexts. Her understanding of the litigation process from start to finish gives her clients confidence in her advice.
Elisabeth has earned a reputation with her clients and colleagues as a natural advocate both inside and outside of the courtroom. In addition to conducting three civil jury trials in the first six years of her practice, Elisabeth has acted for clients in administrative proceedings at the License Appeal Tribunal, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Landlord and Tenant Board, and the Social Benefits Tribunal. She has acted as appeal counsel at the Divisional Court and has conducted over 100 examinations for discovery and examinations under oath. Elisabeth is also an experienced negotiator, having participated in well over 200 mediations.
Elisabeth’s mastery of the law of evidence earned her the course prize in law school and she enjoys using her expertise in this area to assist clients and colleagues in understanding key evidentiary issues and concepts. Additionally, while in law school, Elisabeth summered and worked at the Queen’s Business Law Clinic where she assisted small businesses and not-for-profits pro bono with corporate, commercial, and intellectual property law issues.
Elisabeth’s clients retain her not only for her skills but also because she genuinely enjoys building long-lasting solicitor-client relationships. Outside of work, Elisabeth is a hobbyist who currently enjoys playing the piano, staying active, cooking 100 new recipes per year, and working on her local history project called “Humber History”. Elisabeth sits on the Board of Directors for Heritage York.
Successful defence of a priority dispute between insurers initiated by Unica.
Successful defence of the Applicant’s request for reconsideration of the previous decision of the Tribunal barring the Applicant from proceeding with a claim for income replacement benefits because she failed to attend an insurer’s examination arranged under s. 44 of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.
Successful motion to extend the deadline for exchanging surveillance evidence, catastrophic impairment reports, and adjourning the hearing.
Successful opposed motion to compel attendance at a defence medical examination. Awarded costs thrown away for a failed examination and costs of the motion.
Successful preliminary issue hearing under section 56 of the SABS on whether the applicant was statute-barred from pursuing her claim for post-104 week income replacement benefits resulting in a dismissal of the application with costs.
Preliminary issue hearing under section 56 of the SABS on whether the applicant was statute-barred from pursuing her claims for medical benefits due to the expiry of the limitation period.
Successful loss transfer arbitration. Arbitrator held that photographs of a heavy vehicle taken after an incident are not prima facie proof of the vehicle’s location on the roadway at the time of the incident for the purposes of the Fault Determination Rules.
After winning at trial, Elisabeth obtained a judgment of over $280,000 in costs and disbursements in favour of her client.
Successful threshold motion after a five week jury trial with the Court finding that the Plaintiff did not meet the threshold of serious permanent impairment of an important physical mental or psychological function. Action was dismissed with costs.
Successful motion to strike jury questions. Court struck three heads of damages: future care, housekeeping, and income loss) due to the Plaintiff’s failure to lay the requisite evidentiary foundation.
Responding to the plaintiff’s motion to re-open his case after he failed to file evidence in support of his claim for damages.
Contentious pre-trial motion and voir dire brought under s. 22.1 of the Ontario Evidence Act. At issue was whether the Plaintiff’s conviction under the Highway Traffic Act precluded him from re-litigating the essential facts underlying the conviction or whether doing so would constitute an abuse of process.
Successful defence of a human rights application against a daycare facility. After a full hearing on the issues, the Tribunal dismissed the application in its entirety. The applicant’s request for reconsideration was denied.
Responding to a summary judgment motion on behalf of the plaintiff.